liz muller & partners: scaling up positive change
  • Home
  • Services
  • ABOUT US
  • Clients
  • Blogs
  • Work Products
  • CONTACTS

Soil Health: A Simple Standard Yielding Rich Results

1/15/2013

9 Comments

 
For quite some time the need to harmonize standards and certification schemes has generated a lot of discussion among the sustainable agriculture community. There are several good reasons for wanting a more harmonized – and hopefully efficient and impactful – approach. Just a few of these include:

· Farmers and producers can focus on one set of criteria for reporting and certification activities, saving valuable time and resources. This is especially important in agriculture where farmers often grow different crops from year to year (e.g. soil-enriching rotations, shifts in market drivers).

· Consistent labor standards would be more effective where farm workers rotate between farms and crops throughout a year.

· Brands and other supply chain partners would only having to manage, measure, and communicate a common set of criteria and impacts.

· Consumers likely would have a better understanding of (and possibly commitment to) certifications that are more consistent in their meaning across different products and standards.

I believe that harmonized standards – that are also simple and flexible – will lead to wider adoption and thus an overall bigger positive impact. With this in mind, I have given thought to the question of how to harmonize standards as I work within and around many different certification systems and agriculture roundtables in various capacities. How effective standards and certification schemes are in achieving their intended objectives is another important topic I have given much thought (and have written about in past newsletters).

I was facilitating a biofuels regulations and voluntary standards workshop recently when such a question was raised. A participant asked presenters from the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) and United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), “If you were to have a standard focus on one criteria, what would it be?”

I could not miss this opportunity to share my proposed answer to the very question I have asked myself many times. I was quite confident in my response: the optimization of soil health.  The optimization of soil health is one of the most (if not the most) critical conditions we must meet to ensure productive agriculture. Healthy soil will more efficiently provide required nutrients to a plant and improve: water retention, tolerance to limited rainfall (lessening irrigation demand), and a plant’s ability to resist disease and damage by pests. Farmers can be encouraged to optimize soil health through the use of organic fertilizers, no-till operations, and proper crop rotation – all practices that can easily be understood and implemented by most farmers. I believe that such basic and simple practices, with other supporting mechanisms in place (e.g. education opportunities, social support services), many of the impacts sought by standards would be natural outcomes of their focused attention on soil health. Improved soil health should reap a higher yield, resulting in a higher income, sufficient supply to meet increasing demands, and lessening the conversion of biodiverse land for agricultural production. Healthy soils uptake carbon dioxide, capturing and storing greenhouse gases.

Farmers are more likely to succeed if they are asked to focus on one objective that directly aligns with their core business and area of expertise. If harmonized standards require farmers to spread their resources and attention over many issues – most of which are not as directly relevant to their day to day lives or for which they feel they don’t have direct influence (e.g. cultural shifts in gender equality, availability of education) – then their success will be weakened by being pulled in too many directions. Standards and certification bodies and other stakeholders within the agricultural community could measure and communicate the direct or indirect benefits that come out of optimizing soil health. Harmonizing a standard with a focus on soil health would result in benefits for all of the players mentioned at the beginning of this piece – the farmers, the brands, and consumers – improving likelihood of wide scale adoption.

Going back to the question that was posed at the workshop, I think it is interesting to note that both the UNEP and FAO representatives responded to the question with the same response:  land rights.  While I agree that land rights are critical to improving agriculture production and social justice, I propose that requiring soil health standards would contribute to improved respect of land rights, as governments would see the economic and social benefits of improved soil health along with evidence that farmers tend to take better care of the land they own over land that they only lease or otherwise access.

I hope more sincere efforts to harmonize standards and certification schemes around a few meaningful criteria such as soil health are pursued. I am confident that it will have a positive overall impact – which is the simple goal I believe we all seek to achieve.
9 Comments
bulk link
3/2/2017 12:21:13 am

This is very educational content and written well for a change. It's nice to see that some people still understand how to write a quality post!

Reply
iphysio link
7/10/2017 03:30:35 am

This has truly made me think and I plan to peruse more

Reply
Lip Augmentation link
11/27/2017 02:39:04 am


Excellent article. Very interesting to read. I really love to read such a nice article. Thanks! keep rocking.

Reply
https://stdauthority.com/hepatitis-a-symptoms link
1/31/2018 12:21:30 am

Yes i am totally agreed with this article and i just want say that this article is very nice and very informative article.I will make sure to be reading your blog more. You made a good point but I can't help but wonder, what about the other side? !!!!!!THANKS!!!!!!

Reply
online CPR certification link
3/6/2018 11:55:31 pm

Thanks for your insight for your fantastic posting. I’m glad I have taken the time to see this.

Reply
O3 Prenatal DHA - 100% Vegan/Vegetarian with Algae Oil (No Mercury!) - Diet Standards Best Prenatal DHA Omega-3 Vitamins for Pregnancy link
10/24/2018 12:06:50 am

Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Big thanks for the useful info.

Reply
https://www.pharmica.co.uk/anti-malaria/ link
11/1/2018 12:07:47 am

Thanks for sharing us.

Reply
keto diet weight loss link
1/14/2019 10:32:31 pm

Thanks for the post and great tips..even I also think that hard work is the most important aspect of getting success..

Reply
insta stalker link
8/14/2019 07:37:52 pm

Thanks for a wonderful share. Your article has proved your hard work and experience you have got in this field. Brilliant .i love it reading.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    October 2019
    August 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    February 2016
    October 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    October 2012
    August 2012

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly